My two "profound thinking" type innovations, 1 "The Existence of Human Genetic Behaviors" and 2 "The Existence of Life Energy"

Stephen Cheng
"Profound Thinking" Type Innovation Promoter

My first puzzle: Humans are animals. Should humans have behaviors from instincts just like animals do?

I have noticed Westerners can successfully operate democratic societies while others have failed. Democracy is wonderful since it offers a freer and more equitable society. However, no one can answer why Westerners facilitate democratic societies more prevalently than other nationalities. To outsiders, democracy is like a distant paradise that only Westerners have achieved. Conversely, other ethnicities, namely the Chinese, Russians, Arabs, Africans, South-East Asians, Ukrainians, Northern Europeans, Middle and South Americans have also tried but all have failed. What were the causes of their failures? This justification exemplifies a mysterious puzzle that compels us to find its causes. These rationales are important because Hong Kong and Taiwan are currently trying to build democratic societies, too. If we cannot determine the cause, they will likely fail as well. The democratic movement has already created some confusion in the societies there. The reason why Korea, Japan and Singapore can run a better society is because they utilize a controlling type of governance system (the opposite of self-determination is controlling). Basically, the people are following what the government mandates. They are not running a true democratic society.

To solve these puzzles, I devised my first profound thinking innovative idea, entitled, “The Existence of Human Genetic Behaviors.” To come up with a profound thinking solution one requires to do some thinking. I hope readers can follow my way of thinking. The following justifies how I derived my theory. All animals have instincts; for example, a young cat will learn how to effectively catch mice after merely a few tries. A German shepherd always barks at a stranger, while a small Peking dog always wags its tail. We call these animal instincts. However, humans are animals, too. Therefore, humans should also have instincts. Presently, some critics negate that humans have instincts. The human mind is blank at birth, and the human needs to learn everything anew. A young cat can learn “mice catching” one thousand time faster than it learns circus tricks. Instincts are highly beneficial. Then why do humans need to abandon such positive benefits? It is illogical to sacrifices these instinctual advantages. The only logical answer is that humans also have instincts, but people are unable to see those instincts. As intelligent animals, humans can alter our behaviors from instincts quickly to adapt to new environments, yet animals cannot alter their behaviors from instincts, which is why people often reject that humans also have behaviors from instincts. But in altering behaviors from instincts, first humans need to realize the environment has changed that a certain behavior from instinct does not fit the new environment. Then he needs to put in an effort to alter that certain behavior.

In turn, what exactly is an instinct? I deem that instinct is merely memory transmitted genetically from one generation to the next in the form of "experience,” memory from repeatable but not single events. Experiences are acquired through repeating events and not single event. How memory can disseminate genetically is still unknown. My next theory describes a hypothesis for this premise. Currently, we consider it as an unknown. Old experiences can easily be recovered. Actually it is this old experience which animals can recover quickly allows animals to survive. A young cat must able to learn quickly how to catch mince in order to survive. This also explains how Monarch butterflies find the overwintering sites each year. How they know their way, even though the butterflies returning to Mexico each fall are the great-great-grandchildren of the butterflies that left the previous spring. Monarch butterflies migrate from Mexico all the way to Canada and back. They die one-quarter of the journey. But their children continue the journey. When they have reached Canada and back to Mexico to the same tree, it is already their great-great-grandchildren. How to explain this? The only explanation is experience can be passed down to the offspring.

Thus this genetic memory (experience) controls how people behave in reaction to a particular situation facing him the first time. I label these actions as human genetic behaviors, which are similar to animals” instincts. Therefore, humans have instincts, too.

From the above we can form two rules about human genetic behaviors;

Rule 1. Our ancestors’ experience skills can be passed down to us genetically, just like a cat can learn mice catching quickly. This is called human genetic behaviors.

Rule 2. Humans are intelligent animals. If a certain human genetic behavior does not fit well in the present environment, humans can adjust that behavior quickly.

The reason why we have the first rule is because humans are animals too. Whatever rules can be applied to animals should also be applied to humans too. Therefore humans should have genetic behaviors, just like animals have instincts. The reason why we have the second rule is because humans are intelligent animals. If a certain genetic behavior does not fit well in the present environment, humans can adjust that behavior quickly. Animals are not able to do so.

If people truly have genetic behaviors, then we can explain many racial behavioral differences by examining humans's genetic backgrounds; for example, why Westerners can maintain a democratic society while others have all failed. This is like Newton discovered the two laws of mechanism. Using his two laws of mechanism, we can build buildings safe. To find the answer why Westerners can maintain a true democratic society while others have failed, we must reflect how human ancestors lived during ancient times. The Westerners’ ancestors lived in the cold weather environments of Western Europe. The Arabs’ ancestors dwelled in the desert environments of the Middle East. Chinese and Russians both started from the Yellow River, which passes through the Gobi Desert. Blacks’ ancestors resided in the hot environment of Africa. Similarly, the South-East Asians lived in the hot environment of South-East Asia.

The Westerners’ ancestors lived in the frigid climate of Western Europe, so I easily imagine that life in this cold environment was difficult, which dictated these people's behaviors. They had to form hunting groups to survive. Food was not a problem after human invented hunting tools. The most important factor affecting people's behaviors was the cold weather, which could easily and quickly kill. Any unlucky person, who was unable to return to shelter when a blizzard suddenly arrived, could face death. Therefore, in order to maintain the population, people regarded life as extremely precious; they did all that they could to preserve it. People in this environment could select a leader, but if his or her performance did not maintain the group’s expectations, a new leader could be chosen. Because life was scarce and group members were hard to recruit, each member was considered to be equal: each member's personal preferences were highly respected, as long as the performance of the entire group was not impacted. In turn, concepts of democracy and human rights likely originated in Western culture. Considering life as precious probably influenced many behaviors, such as social justice, fairness to reduce disputes, foster peace, etc. Each member must behave unselfishly; otherwise other members would not be willing to form the group with him. Therefore, Westerners’ evolved behaviors were typically more peaceful and fair. This is simply a logical deduction.

Conversely, Arabic, Chinese and Russian ancestors lived in harsh environments in the desert. I infer that the harsh environment dictated these people's behaviors. They could only survive if they maintained a certain ‘desert people’ mentality. They needed to hunt and survive as a group because there was very little chance of surviving individually. They competed with other groups for scarce resources, therefore group fighting was common. They needed very skillful leaders to guide the groups because incompetence resulted in death in the desert. Members respected their leaders significantly and they were highly obedient to their superior’s orders. In other words, they operated like an army: the leader had absolute power over the group and considered the interest of the whole as more important than the individual member’s interests. In turn, a controlling type governance system likely originated in the desert people culture. Confucius’ teaching was based on this controlling type governance system. They needed to behave in this manner in order to survive in the desert. Again, the above thinking is simply a logical deduction. The difference between a controlling leader and an authoritarian leader is the controlling leader loves his people and considers his people. His job is to make sure each member's duty to contribute to the society be carried out. As a member of a society, each member has a duty to contribute to the society in order for the society to operate. An authoritarian leader treats his people as his slaves. Therefore people love and respect a controlling leader and hate a authoritarian leader. There were only controlling leaders at first, otherwise they could survive in the harsh environment without the cooperation of each member. Only after the establishment of cities, some bad leaders abused their power and became authoritarian leaders.

Likewise, blacks? and South-East Asians’ ancestors also lived in the hot environment of Africa and South East Asia. Again, people survived by hunting and gathering with extended families. People did not need to compete with nature. Because of this, the area became overcrowded. Individual or small group fighting to compete for resources became common. Here basically small groups survived by themselves. As mentioned, the above thinking is just a logical deduction. The above racial genetic memory can be transmitted to our respective modern people. This genetic memory forms their respective genetic behaviors.

The job of a governance system is to achieve the welfare of its people. The democratic system is achieved by self-discipline and social fairness. It is not the "freedom" that people would think, but people have to control themselves to only do things that are beneficial to the society. The controlling system is achieve by high discipline and hardworking.When westerners enter an elevator, they will check and hold the door if someone is behind them. They do this by themselves because this behavior is beneficial to the society. Non-Westerners will not do this because government control order is not here. But at the place where control order can be applied, such as in a production factory, the Chinese will work harder and higher discipline than Westerners.

Next, I want to address the puzzle concerning why the rest of the people have failed to adapt a democratic society. A democratic society is wonderful because everyone is freer and conditions are fairer. Everyone enjoys a rich and progressive society. Yet reality verifies that only people from Western Europe have been able to maintain a democratic society. Four years after an “Arab Spring” movement permeated across the Arabic countries, many people in Arabic countries have indeed attempted to adapt a democratic society, but today many have failed. Not only did they fail to improve citizens’ standard of living, but they also created turmoil in the region. Some tyrants who treat their country’s wealth as their own have been removed. But not a single democratic society has been established. There is only one country that has avioded the turmoil. That is Tunisia. There was turmoil in Tunisia at first. But after local politicians saw the suffering of the people, they stopped fighting and creates a National Dialogue Center. They work out their differences instead. Recently the center wins the Nobel Peace prize. This shows people are intelligent animals which can alter their behaviors to fit a new environment.

Similarly, this phenomenon had happened in China. After the fall of the corrupt Qing Dynasty in the early twenty century, Sun Yat-sen tried to establish a democratic China, but military lords divided the country. Sun Yat-sen attempted to unite the fragmented nation. After Sun’s death, the Kuomintang government and Communist Party of China entered into civil war. Thousands of Chinese were killed during the conflict. China did not become peaceful again until the Communist Party of China won the civil war in 1949. China run under a controlling type governance system and China progresses. Now Hong Kong and Tai Wan want to run democratic societies, yet my theory hypothesizes that they will not be successful without making adjustment to their genetic behaviors.

The answer lies in people’s genetic behaviors. Different races produce different genetic behaviors. When the position of the leader is unstable, the desert people’s genetic behaviors will compel them to fight and win the position of leader. On the other hand, Westerners, the cold weather people’s genetic behaviors, implore them to win the desired position through election. These differences justify why we have seen so much group fighting in the Middle East. The "Occupy Wall Street" movement by Westerners is a peaceful movement that promotes an awareness of social and economic inequality. They protest "corporate influence," particularly from the financial services sector that corrupts our political parties. Protestors occupied Zuccotti Park, located in New York City's Wall Street financial district. After their message was delivered, they moved from Zuccotti Park two months later. This depiction shows how protests by Westerners are only used to deliver a message. On the other hand, protests by non-Westerners are intended “to fight to win.” The “Occupy Central” movement in Hong Kong uses a fight to win strategy. They blocked the main streets of Hong Kong causing traffic chaos. This is not a democratic behavior. Democratic behavior requires one to explain why one’s idea is better and persuade others to follow. In case members cannot come to an agreement, the majority rules. Dr. Kin-man Chan is one of the organizerof the “Occupy Central” movement. He withdraw from the movement later. He says before a TV camera that he realizes after some thinking, it is wrong to use force in a democratic movement. This shows Chinese people do have a genetic behavior of using force to solve a problem. But people are intelligent animals. People can alter their behavior to fit the new environment. That was exactly what has happened to Dr. Chan.

People are usually not aware that they are behaving according to their genetic behaviors. When people see Westerners’ democratic societies as freer and better, they want to experience those virtues, too. But people are unaware their genetic behaviors do not fit a democratic society. Therefore, people’s behavioral problems by non-Westerners can only be solved by people willing to adjust their genetic behaviors to fit a democratic society.

Essentially, there is a misunderstanding in the meaning of democracy and human rights by non-Westerners. Democracy encourages everyone to voice their ideas. But the idea must bring benefits to the general public and not to oneself or a small group of people. Democracy means that one is willing to act for the good of the society and not for the benefit of oneself. For example in Western countries there are less corruption than non-western counties. One should also be willing to sacrifice one's own interests for the good of the society. For example people pay 40-60% income tax in Western countries, and there is also a consumer tax. In non-Western countries, such as Hong Kong, people only pay 10-20%. The true meaning of human rights is if one's interest does not affect the performance of the society, one has the right to refuse the sacrifice. Take for example, gay rights. In Western countries, gay rights are protected, because this behavior does not affect the performance of overall society. In many non-Western countries, gay rights are suppressed.

Westerners have the suitable genetic behavior to behave that benefits the society and not to advance themselves. They refuse to make the sacrifice if one's interest does not affect the performance of the society. This allows the society to become prosperous. On the other hand, the desert people’s genetic behaviors operate like an army: they warrant order from above. Their advantage is that they can operate rapidly and efficiently. However, when control is relaxed, they tend to do things which benefit themselves. This explanation validates why we have counterfeit video discs, illegal recycled cooking oil and poisonous baby milk power in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. These behaviors significantly harm the society. In a democratic society, people need self-discipline and self-promotion to behave in a manner that benefits the society, not to advance themselves.

Another issue I have noticed is Westerners consider economics is the most important factor in joining or separating a country. Take for example in the proposed separation referendum of Scotland from England, Scotland remains inside England because they find it economically better in doing so. On the other hand Ukraine broke its alliance with Russia with no consideration what will be the damage to their economic by doing so. They just want to distant themselves from Russia for no apparent reason. Now Ukraine is in economic ruin. Why has this happened?

The answer can also be found from the desert people’s genetic behavior. The desert people’s ancestor lived in a controlling type governance system. The leader had absolute power over his people. Because of this, some bad leaders had abused their power. I can give you a story about what had happened to my great grandfather. My great grandfather lived around 1850 to 1915. At that time Empress Dowager Cixi was in power. My great grandfather was rich. He had something very precious. At that time there was a law that if someone had something very precious, one needed to offer it to the Empress. My great grandfather did not do so. Empress Dowager Cixi found out. My great grandfather received very harsh punishment.

Many desert people’s ancestors might have experienced the abusive treatment from some bad controlling leaders in the past. As time went by, the descendants may not know the story, but their feeling of avoiding a controlling type leader can pass on genetically generation after generation. This is like my children afraid of dog by instinct. But I have never told them my story of being attacked by a dog when I was a kid. That is why some Ukrainians want their country to distant from Russia for no apparent reason, if we do not know genetic behavior. In doing so, Ukraine’s economic is in ruin.

Recently Hong Kong legislators rejected a proposed process in the selection of Hong Kong chief executive. The reason is that in the proposed process, candidates need to go through a filtering system that he/she must be someone who “loves China and loves Hong Kong? It is true in Western countries in a presidential election; candidates do not need to go through a filtering system. But their people and their candidates’ genetic behavior is to achieve economic success. In Hong Kong about one third of the people have the genetic behavior of “distant Hong Kong from China”. If the candidate has that kind of genetic behavior gets elected, what has happened to Ukraine may also happen to Hong Kong.

One person told me that he hate China because the "Red Guards" had done considerable suffering to his family. Is this a democratic behavior? Look at what President Obama does. Vietnam and US were at war not long ago. But now they are join force to compete economically against China. Democratic behavior only look for what is good at the present time. To solve this problem, Hong Kong people need to know this kind of “distant Hong Kong from China” genetic behavior has passed down to some of them. They should realize that time has changed. We are no longer lived in Empress Dowager Cixi’s time that the leader has absolute power over us. There are no more the "Red Guards". Therefore this genetic behavior should be stopped. Like Westerners do, the most important job of a leader is to achieve economic success. If the people of Hong Kong can do that, this candidate filtering system should be abolished.

Therefore, if the people of Hong Kong and Taiwan want a true democratic society, they have to make adjustments in their genetic behaviors. To achieve the goal, I suggest the establishment of a Democratic Behaviors Guiding Centre. The Centre can be run by a university. The Centre guides people regarding how to behave democratically. Democratic behaviors include numerous issues. Basically one should behave in such a way that benefits overall society. When the society becomes prosperous, everyone receives the benefits. If Hong Kong is successful, Hong Kong can set as an example to the world for how non-Westerners can also operate a true democratic society. Right now no non-Western country has successfully run a true democratic society.

All in all, there are two ways to build a prosperous society: 1. Members willingly treat society’s interests above individual’s needs to foster. That is the Western democratic way. 2. A strong, good leader ensures that every member obeys societal interests above individual ones, which is the traditional, controlling type, desert people approach. Members enjoy each other's contributions and the society becomes prosperous. For non-Western people who have not adjusted to the democratic behaviors yet, they can only look for a good, strong leader.

The way to verify this theory is to carry out an experiment whereby a group of ten couples (i.e. male and female) of mice are initially trained to push three buttons in sequence, red, yellow and blue, before they receive a food reward. The average length of time required to train them is recorded. The mice will continue to be fed in this manner for the rest of their lives. The five couples with the longest, not shortest, training times are then selected. From their offspring select another group of ten couples. These ten couples are again trained and fed in the same manner and the length of time needed to be trained is also recorded. This goes on for many generations. As a consequence of selective breeding theory, these mice should be taking longer and longer get trained, with each successive generation. However, if my theory is correct, these mice will be taking shorter and shorter times to get trained, with each successive generation. I expect the required training time will be shortened after each generation and after many generations a talented mouse might appear who can learn very quickly. After more generations all the mice will be talented and this behavior becomes an instinct for this group of mice. This is the mature stage of inheriting genetic experience. After reaching this mature stage, no more improvement of training time can be observed. This takes about 7 generations. This information is taken from British pigeon farmers when they try to create a new breed of pigeons.This experiment will verify whether genetic behaviors do exist.

I have tried to search out laboratories that would be interested in carrying out the above experiment, but I have yet to find one. I hope someone can help me to further develop be my theory and willing to carry out the above experiment. This is a revolutionary idea. If it is proven to be true, the reward is tremendous. This genetic behavior theory can explain why we have “genetic separatist ” youths in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Also why the Arabic youths can perform "suicide bombing" and why black youths have violent tendencies. By letting these youths understand why they behave the way they are, they can adjust their behaviors and become useful citizens again. This is a great benefit to the society.

There is another way to verify if my theory is true, I need data to show that human genetic behaviors are observed by most people. Now how people in the world behave can be used in data collecting. We use the three groups of people above, the Westerners, the desert people and the hot weather people for data collection. This is another way to verify my theory because by observation we have determined animals have instincts. We need to use the same method to determine if humans have instincts too? So observe the way how the Westerners, the desert people and the hot weather people behave in relation to their respective genetic background, choose which model is more close to reality:-

Model 1: The human mind is blank at birth and humans need to learn everything anew.

Model 2: Humans have genetic behaviors just like animals have instincts. But humans are intelligent animals. Humans can alter their genetic behaviors quickly to fit the new environment. That is why people have not noticed humans’ genetic behaviors.

To alter an individual's behaviors is not too difficult, but to alter people of a nation's behaviors is hard. That is why we can find trace of human genetic behaviors from the people of a nation. Please choose which model is more close to reality and fill out the survey form below. The collected data will help me to publish my theory in a journal one day. Thank you for your participation.

Create your free online surveys with SurveyMonkey , the world's leading questionnaire tool.

My second puzzle: Is life also a kind of energy form?

We have many energy forms, for example kinetic energy, potential energy, electric and magnetic energy, heat energy, etc. Then is life also one kind of energy form? I do think so and I have devised an experiment to verify if this is true? Life is biochemical reaction. Biochemical reaction is strange. It can turn an embryo into a human being. Normal chemical reaction is random. If biochemical reactions follow our normal physics laws which are random, it should turn the embryo into a piece of tumor. Therefore life does not follow our physics laws. It has its own laws. There is a mystery we need to solve.

I need to come up with a theory which can solve this mystery and verify if it is true by experiment. The existence of the “life energy” can solve this puzzle. The following explains how the life energy works. Food is mostly carbohydrates. Carbohydrates are stable at body temperature. In order to make carbohydrates to react chemically, it needs to be brought up to the activated stage as shown in Fig.1 below. This activation energy is supplied by the life energy. The life energy can supply activation energy to the designated carbohydrate molecules to urge them to react. How much activation energy do we need to catalyze the biochemical reaction? We need an experiment to find that out. My estimate is it is about 20% of the produced energy from the biochemical reaction.


I need to find an experiment which can verify the existence of this “life energy”. As in any energy form, energy can be stored or released. For example, we can lift a weight to increase its potential energy, and we can recover that energy when the weight is lowered. This is also likely true with this life energy form. The storage of the life energy must be achieved while we are sleeping, possibly by the brain since the brain is shut down during sleep for some still not completely known reason. After sleeping, we feel refreshed, both physically and mentally, because we have re-charged our life energy. Animals are very vulnerable during sleep, thus there must be a good evolutionary reason for animals to sleep.

We can make a study experiment to verify the existence of this life energy form. A person is sleeping in a bed size human calorimeter chamber. The chamber can be made of reflective air bubble insulation board (http://www.aerolaminsulations.com/air-bubble-insulation.php) with a solid wooden frame. The chamber has three holes for air inlet, air outlet and respired gas outlet. There is another hole for electric wirings for EEG, temperature sensor and LED light.

We can measure the oxygen consumption and the amount of heat generated by the person while he sleeps. From the oxygen consumption, we can calculate the amount of energy consumed by the person and compare this with the amount of heat generated by the person. The difference represents the amount of energy stored up by the life energy. The EEG can tell exactly when the person has fallen asleep, whether in stages 1, 2, 3, 4, and REM, or awake. The stored up life energy will be used to catalyze biochemical reactions. After depleting, it needs to be recharged again during sleep.

In this experiment we are using direct human calorimeter. Direct human calorimeter measurement was replaced by indirect human calorimeter measurement about 60 years ago. Indirect calorimeter uses oxygen consumption to calculate energy generation. In this experiment we need to measure energy generation and compare it with oxygen consumption. Therefore indirect calorimeter cannot be used here. Direct calorimeter instant measurement of heat generation and compare with oxygen consumption had never been done. At that time direct calorimeter measurements usually took the average results of a long period of time, say a few days. This averaged out the stored life energy in my theory and could not verify its existence.

The most critical point in this experiment is to see if we observe the extra energy recovering from life energy while participants are awake or doing physical exercise. In physics the input energy from oxygen consumption must equal to the output energy from body heat. If we can find extra energy, this is contradicting to physics law. The only explanation is this energy comes from the life energy. This verifies the existence of the life energy. This study experiment measures if energy is lost during sleep (energy stores up in life energy) and extra energy be found during wakefulness (energy recovers from life energy.) Fig. 2 shows the outline of the study experiment during exercising and during sleeping.


There will be 3 participants in this experiment. Each participant spends 3 nights sleeping in the calorimeter chamber and 2 hours per day doing physical exercise in the calorimeter. The experiment total lasts 9 days and nights. Because of the size of the calorimeter, the respired gas can be collected quickly, we can instantly analysis oxygen consumption and heat production during stages 1, 2, 3, 4 and REM of sleep and during wakefulness and physical exercise while lying down.

I consider my innovative idea of the existence of the life energy has the pretty high possibility to be turned out to be true for the following reasons:

1. Deprivation of sleep in lab animals can cause them to die with no sign of damage to their vital organs. There must be some mechanism important to biochemical reactions and that becomes exhausted from deprivation of sleep. Possibly the cause is the lowering of life energy level from lack of sleep. The supply of activation energy by the life energy to allow biochemical reactions to take place has stopped. Sleep recharges the life energy.

2. The amount of DNA data passed down from the egg and sperm is about 1.5GB. This information is provided by Yevgeniy Grigoryev of Scripps Research Institute at http://bitesizebio.com/8378/how-much-information-is-stored-in-the-human-genome/. The adult human body is made up of about 37 trillion cells. A trillion is about 1,000 times bigger than a GB. This 1.5GB is too small for the alikeness of the twins to occur. In order for the twins’ alikeness to occur, there must be some sort of invisible mold exists that guides the biochemical reactions. Life energy can supply activation energy to the designated carbohydrate molecules to urge them to react. Because the reaction only takes place by the designated molecules, the shape of the body can be controlled. This is how to make twins look alike. The mold must contain a series of frames with a time different of a short period, say a month and run to the age of 120, the oldest age of mankind. This is like a reel of movie which runs on 24 frames per second for two hours. Yet the data passed down by DNA is 1000 times smaller than just the total addresses of the cells of one frame. It is impossible for the DNA to carry the data. There must be some other mechanism which can carry very very large amount of data passing down together with the DNA. This mechanism is most likely made of life energy because there is nothing else passing down together with the DNA. When there is a possibility, we should try to verify it.

3. During organ transplant, it is reported that the memory of donor is also transferred to the recipient as well. (http://www.mindpowernews.com/OrganMemoryTransfer.htm). Therefore I believe memory is stored in every part of our body by the life energy. The brain is only a sensor to read the memory recorded in energy form. This is a possibility. The reason why only 15 percent recipients of organ transplant experienced a change in personality is because the transplanted organ is small in comparison of the whole body. This is a weak memory.

The following is the correct way to handle this profound thinking type hypothesis. Suppose in a casino there is $1 million on the table. You need an extra card to win this $1 million. The cost of the extra card is $100. The chance of getting the card you want is one hundredth. Should you take the bet? Of cause you should because $100x100=10,000. But your reward is $1 million. This is the same with my hypothesis. We should carry out the experiment even the chance of turning out a positive result is one hundredth. Because the reward of solving the mystery of life is too great. Most people do not know how to handle a profound thinking type hypothesis. My estimate of the possibility of turning out a positive result of this experiment is over 50%. I have approched many many universities to carry out the experiment. I am willing to pay the cost of the experiment. But nobody is willing to carry it out. I believe this is because people do not have the "profound thinking" skill to see my idea has the potential to be turned out to be true. Any reader know any university willing to carry out the experiment please let me know.

Our scientists and students should practise this profound thinking skill. It is only after they have acquired the ability to see possibilities and determine how good those possibilities are, then they can come up with revolutionary innovations such as the airplane, the telephone and the talking machine etc. Those innovative ideas cannot be proven to be true in advance, but there is a possibility the ideas will turn out to be true. I sincerely hope our scientists and students will start practicing profound thinking skill.

You can also study my "profound thinking" type inventions next.

If you have any question or comment, write to Stephen Cheng