[PREVIOUS] [NEXT]

[HOME]

The “Theory of Human Genetic Behaviors” can explain why non-Westerners have all failed to maintain a truly democratic society and how to avoid that

I have developed the "Theory of Human Genetic Behaviors". By applying my theory, I have found my theory can explain why non-Westerners have all failed to maintain a truly democratic society and how to avoid that. The explanation is we all have passed down genetic behaviors and we act with the instinct to our genetic behaviors. But non-Westerners’ passed down genetic behaviors are unfit to a democratic system. For example, Westerners genetically consider economics is the most important factor in joining or separating a country. However, the non-Westerners genetically consider “ranking improvement” (not to be ruled by some higher authority but they want to rule other people) is the most important factor. This is because humans are animals too. Whatever rules can be applied to animals should also be feasible for humans. This behavioral difference can be compared to a German Sheppard dog will genetically bark at a stranger while a small Peking dog will genetically wag its tail. Therefore, non-Westerners’ countries can only be divided into smaller ones until there is a war where the stronger entity conquers the smaller ones. That is why in Western countries people can freely talk about the separation of a country (Westerners are considering economical reason) but in non-Western countries, people cannot talk about separation (non-Westerners are considering ranking improvement reason). The following is how I developed my theory.

I use logical reasoning to derive my theory (logical reasoning is an essential part of critical thinking). My theory starts with this premise: We know animals have instincts; for example, a young cat will learn how to effectively catch mice after merely a few attempts as a survival requirement. A German Sheppard dog will genetically bark at a stranger while a small Peking dog will genetically wag its tail. But what exactly is instinct? I deem that instinct is merely memory transmitted genetically from one generation to the next in the form of "old experience." At present we have no knowledge how is this done (my next theory may give us some hint). But humans are animals, too. Therefore, humans should also have instincts. I label these human instincts as "genetic behaviors." Two rules govern human genetic behaviors:

Rule 1. Our ancestors' experiences and skills are transmitted to us genetically, just like a cat's instinct to help it to learn mice catching quickly. This phenomenon is called human genetic behaviors.

Rule 2. Humans are intelligent animals. If a certain human genetic behavior does not accommodate the present environment, humans can adjust that behavior quickly. Animals cannot.

The reason why we have the first rule is that humans are animals, too. Whatever rules can be applied to animals should also be feasible for humans. Thus, humans should have genetic behaviors, just like animals have instincts. The reason why we have a second rule is that humans are intelligent animals. If a certain genetic behavior does not fit well in the present environment, humans can adjust that behavior quickly. Animals are unable to do so. Because humans can make behavioral adjustments that is why people have not noticed humans also have instincts (genetic behaviors). By comparing our brain to a computer, it seems as if our brain is not a new computer that warrants all sorts of programs for installation; rather it is an old computer that has all sorts of old programs already installed. Our behaviors act according to these old programs. If we want to change a certain behavior, we need an update to that program. Of course, if a program remains unused for a long time, we must engage in a few practices to eliminate the rust.

If people truly have genetic behaviors, then we can explain many racial behavioral differences by investigating humans' genetic backgrounds; for example, why can Westerners maintain a truly democratic society while non-Westerners have all failed? Using these two rules is like applying Newton's two laws of mechanism to construct buildings safely. To find the answer to why Westerners can maintain a truly democratic society while all others have failed, we must reflect upon how human ancestors lived during ancient times. Humans are group-oriented animals. To make the group successful, each member needs to contribute to the group and does nothing that will harm the group. In the early days of mankind's group living, two methods were established to achieve this goal. 1. A controlling governance system (people call it authoritarianism) was formulated to ensure each member made his/her fair share of contribution to the group and does no harm to the group. 2. A self-discipline governance system (people call it democracy) was devised that each member voluntarily makes his or her fair contribution to the group and does no harm to the group. It depended on the environment where ancient people lived that enabled people to choose which governance system was more suitable. In the desert environment of the Middle East and Northern China (Gobi desert where the Yellow River passes through), people chose the controlling governance system. In the cold weather environment of North-western Europe, people selected the self-discipline governance system.

The rationale is pretty obvious. In ancient times, the desert environment required people to determine a skillful leader to guide the group to hunt in the desert. Any mistake, such as missing a waterhole, could mean death for the group. By watching the sun, moon, and stars, the leader knew exactly where the waterholes were located and where to hunt for animals. Members needed to learn this skill from the bottom. Therefore, a ranking system was created. Members with sophisticated skills were higher in the ranking and could give orders to members of lower-ranking or punishments for making mistakes. In a way, it was similar to the ranking system in a Chinese Kungfu club. Group members were very loyal to the group and respected the group leader's skills; because without the group, they could not survive. In this manner, the controlling governance system (authoritarianism) originated. The desert had only scarce resources. Groups competed with each other for limited possessions. Therefore, group fighting was common. The desert people were used to this controlling governance environment for more than three thousand years. Unfortunately, when the controlling power is relaxed in the present environment, they may get into trouble. We will touch more about this feature when we talk about the desert people's desire to adapt to a democratic society.

In ancient times in the cold weather environment of North-western Europe, people were facing a common enemy: the cold weather because it could kill. A cold blizzard suddenly arrived. Any unlucky person, who was unable to return to a shelter, could face death. Therefore, to maintain the population, people regarded life as extremely precious; they did all they could to preserve it. Considering life as precious probably influenced many proactive behaviors, such as social justice, fairness to reduce disputes, foster peace, etc. People needed to form groups for hunting. However, nobody could claim that he/she could deal with the cold weather enemy better than others. In turn, each member of the group was considered as equal. The group needed to create a governance system to operate efficiently. They selected a member as the leader. If his/her performance failed to meet expectations, members could select another person as a leader. Because everyone was considered equal, each member's personal preferences were highly respected, as long as the performance of the entire group was not impacted. That was how democracy and human rights likely originated. Food was not a problem after humans invented hunting tools. The way they hunt was similar to Westerners engaging in rodeos currently. Members must be brave. Each member must act unselfishly. Otherwise, others would not be willing to form a group with him or her. That was the only way people could do with the selfish member because each member was considered to be equal. When everyone was considered to be equal, no one had the authority to discipline others. This was unlike the desert people's controlling government system. Therefore democracy is a self-discipline governance system. The selfish member could not survive by himself in the cold environment. Gradually those selfish persons were eliminated or the more intelligent ones were able to adjust their behaviors. In essence, the remaining members were very self-disciplined, so Westerners today are more self-disciplined than other races.

Likewise, blacks and South-East Asians' ancestors lived in the hot settings of Africa and South East Asia. Here people did not need to compete with nature. People could survive by hunting and gathering in a resource rich environment. Because of this condition, the area became overcrowded. Individual or small group fighting to compete for resources became common. Here basically individuals or small family groups survived by themselves. They did not need to form larger groups.

Later about three thousand years ago, the desert people started to migrate to other parts of the world. They had the advantage of group fighting force. They drove away local people consisting of smaller groups, but they still kept their preferred governance system. That is why we have the controlling governance systems (authoritarianism) in Eastern countries like China, Korea, Japan, Mongol, Middle East countries, South America and Northern Europe (Russia and Northern Europe were conquered by Mongols in history). The cold weather people's migration took place much later, in the 15-16 century, after the invention of gun powder. So we have the self-disciplined (democracy) governance system countries in North-western Europe and North America.

In history, the controlling governance system was more successful. China and Egypt have a few thousand years of history while countries of Western Europe have only a few hundred years of history. Westerners were emulating the desert people's governance system at first because they were more successful. Westerners copied the Greek monarch governance system so that they could built countries. They also adapted the Christianity religion because its teaching was close to their genetic thinking. As Westerners became more successful in the 16-17 hundred, they transitioned to the democratic system.

Those ancient experiences and skills can be passed down from generation to generation to our modern people. All in all, there are many genetic behavioral differences between the desert people and the cold weather people. For example, gay rights are allowed in the Western countries (descendants of cold weather people) but gay rights are discouraged in Eastern countries (descendants of desert people). The reason for this is because the self-discipline governance system emphasizes the interest of the individual member. Each member's personal preferences were highly respected, as long as the performance of the entire group was not impacted. That was a human right. But the controlling governance system emphasized the interest of the whole group. Gay behaviors would reduce the newborn rate and weaken the group. In the old days, having group members' loyalty was important. That was why the gay activity was discouraged in desert people historically. This memory can genetically be passed down to our modern people (rule 1). Of course, the situation has changed, so our current population is not affected by gay activity. But for people to make a change to people's genetic image, one needs to undertake a critical thinking exercise that embodies why one prefers to discourage gay activity based on a genetically passed down memory. This discouragement was preferred historically, the situation has changed. In the present day, our population would not be affected by gay activity, so we should give gay people their rights (rule 2). Notice when Westerners were copying the desert people's governance system, they also discouraged gay activities. But after they reverted to a democratic system, they do not prohibit gay activity anymore. Christianity religion came from the desert people. That is why Christianity discourages gay activity.

Now I want to address the problem of why some Hong Kong's youths behave so inappropriately in the recent protests. I do not believe the youths want to protest the extradition law; rather, they are disputing the Hong Kong Government's connection with China. They mentally do not want Hong Kong to be ruled by China. There are two genetic factors that cause some youth of Hong Kong to turn opposition against China. 1. They want "ranking improvement" (not to be ruled by some higher authority but they want to rule other people) and 2. They have a genetic image that China is a highly corrupted country. The first factor is as mentioned above a ranking system was created in the desert people in ancient time. All the time members wanted to improve their ranking stand. This can be passed down to our modern people. If Hong Kong is separated from China, they can achieve “ranking improvement” by getting rid of control from China. The second factor for this opposition is they have a genetic image that China is a highly corrupted country. China has thousands of years of history. China was the center of the world for a long time. China had no outside competition until the last two hundred years ago. Therefore, government officials became complacent. Instead of making sure people gave their fair share of contributions to society, the government officials abused their power. They wanted more money for themselves. This corruption weakened the country, and ordinary people suffered greatly. So when Westerners came to China in the 1800s, China could not compete with them. In other words, China was bullied by the Westerners.

This image of China as a corrupted country can be passed down genetically (rule 1). Not all youths possess such a genetic image. I estimate it is about 40%. But things have changed dramatically in the last thirty years. China performs anti-corruption programs that have placed many corrupt government officials in prison. China builds a large number of infrastructures for easy transportation and improving people's way of life. China opens trade with the rest of the world and has ranked as the second-largest economic country. China makes major advancements in science and technology and serves as the leader in various areas. Some Chinese youths are born with the genetic image that China is a corrupted country, but when they see how China can now stand up against Westerners' bullying, they feel very happy. They see the above changes in China and they feel proud of being Chinese. In other words, the environment has caused a critical thinking shift in Chinese youths that the image of China a corrupted country has been erased (rule 2). Replacing it with the image that China has persevered against Westerners' bullying. They become patriotic. They see China as advancing to lead the world for a better place.

However, Chinese youths outside mainland China, in places like Hong Kong and Taiwan, are not so lucky. They have not felt the prominent changes in China. They still maintain the genetic image that China is a corrupt country. They need a critical thinking exercise to make a change to their genetic image of China, just like youths in mainland China did. One may question why the majority of the protesters are young youths? The reason is youths stay in schools or are recent graduates, so they have little chance to experience the transformations in China. But as time passes, they will gradually experience the change in China. As they grow older, their genetic image of China as a corrupt country will be erased, so that is why the protesters are mostly young youths.

Now non-Westerners are trying to adapt to the democratic governance system, but there are many genetic behaviors needed to undergo a critical thinking exercise to fit into the democratic society. People might think freedom or doing whatever they like could bring prosperity to society, but this myth is illogical. Doing things that one likes but does not benefit society is selfishness. In a democratic society, one needs to self-discipline oneself to only do things that are beneficial to society. I can see many behaviors conducted by Hong Kong's youths that are not appropriate. One example is during the "occupy central" movement, protesters blocked main roads for more than 70 days. Does this action benefit society? Obvious not, it is just the opposite. I would like Hong Kong's youths to rethink their freedom. Can their freedom bring benefits to the entire society? If not, then it is not freedom. It is selfishness. Take a look at "genetic separatist ". Can this behavior bring benefits to society? Let us do a critical thinking exercise. If we follow this path, assuming Hong Kong becomes independent, very soon New Territory will ask for separation from Hong Kong because it has more land and they do not want to listen to Central Hong Kong. The process continues and Hong Kong will be broken into smaller and smaller entities. Finally, it will reach a situation like in Libya or Samaria. Hong Kong's economics will be ruined. Their real intention is "ranking improvement" (not to be ruled by some higher authority but they want to rule other people). They want “ranking improvement” whenever opportunity allows. That is why these "genetic separatist " can only appear in Hong Kong and Taiwan. The correct democratic behavior is to consider economics as the most important factor in joining or separating a country. That is why in Western countries people can freely talk about separating a country but in non-Western countries, people cannot. In Canada, people in Quebec and Alberta tried many times to separate from Canada. Each time they failed because economically they cannot do so. If Hong Kong wants to run a successful democratic society, then people have a lot to learn.

The reason why non-Westerners cannot maintain a truly democratic society is that they do not have a high level of self-discipline controlling skill to only do things that are beneficial to society. After they have adapted the democratic system, they either become corrupt (example Taiwan, South-east Asia, Africa, Northern Europe, Central, and South America, etc.) or they fight with each other (example Middle East countries). The few more successful countries like Singapore, Korea, and Japan are adapting a controlling governance system, not a truly democratic system. Israel is the only exception. Israelis have mingled in the Western communities for more than two thousand years. They have learned the proper democratic behaviors. So they can successfully run a democratic society. This shows it is not easy to learn self-discipline skills.

The reason why Westerners can maintain a truly democratic society is that they went through an elimination process where selfish people were eliminated a long time ago. For more than three thousand years Westerners are using this self-discipline governance system. Their behaviors have adjusted to fit this self-discipline governance system. One sign which might show that this elimination process did occur to Westerners happened in ancient times. Many times, as reported in the news, a certain lonely Westerner/student went to a crowded place or school and opened fire on everyone. This genetic behavior triggered when a Westerner/student feels if he is not accepted by the society/group, he will kill other people before he dies. Of course today one does not have to die if one feels he or she is excluded by the society/group. But in the ancient frigid cold environment of North-western Europe, one could not survive if one was not accepted by his group. Some would take action to kill others before he died. This genetic behavior has transmitted to the Westerners. This genetic behavior does not appear in other races, such as Asians or Blacks.

But right now the United States is imposing this “Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act”. In doing so they are forcing people of Hong Kong to adapt to the democratic system which people of Hong Kong are not prepared for. In the democratic system, people of Hong Kong can freely talk about the separation of Hong Kong from China. The United States can claim people of Hong Kong have no human rights because there is a law forbids people talking about separation. The root of the problem is people of Hong Kong have not yet adjusted their behaviors to fit the democratic system. Particularly they have not considered economics as the most important factor in joining or separating a country. There is no such thing as “ranking improvement” in the democratic system. People are considered to be equal outside of work. In addition violence and giving out false news are also not democratic behaviors. The United States can use human rights and democracy to deceive people of Hong Kong. As a result, Hong Kong’s political situation will be unstable and Hong Kong’s economic system will be ruined. This explains why we have these violent protests recently in Hong Kong and Hong Kong’s economy is going down. The correct way for people of Hong Kong to adapt to a democratic system is to allow a learning period for Hong Kong people to learn the proper democratic behaviors. A Democratic Behaviors Counsel should be set up in a university or a government department in Hong Kong to advice people of proper democratic behaviors. Only then Hong Kong people can successfully run a democratic society. Democracy has its own set of behaviors that needs to be strictly followed. This set of behaviors was created by Westerners' cold-weather environment, which was different from the desert environment or hot weather environment. These are different behaviors. It is just like a German Sheppard dog will genetically bark at a stranger while a small Peking dog will genetically wag its tail. People need to adjust their behaviors from their genetic behaviors in order to run a successful democratic society.

The job of a governance system is to achieve the welfare of its people. But people's genetic backgrounds determine which kind of governance system will be workable. For Chinese people, they are more workable to have a controlling governance system. For more than three thousand years Chinese are using a controlling government system. People of China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan have the same genetic background. Now Hong Kong's citizens want to run a democratic society. The above shows they do not know they need to change their genetic behaviors passed down from a controlling type governance system to fit a democratic type system. Without this change, they cannot successfully run a democratic society. Because Hong Kong youths have unfit genetic behaviors; they are easily influenced and brainwashed by foreign nations' "meddling."

This theory can also explain the recent event why Chinese can successfully defeat the covid-19 pandemic while Westerners fail. Chinese will perform better in an setting where controlling is strictly applied, such as in a manufacturing facility. Westerners can perform better in a self-discipline setting such as in a restaurant. Westerners keep their voice low so that they do not bother other people enjoy eating. Copyright infringing is a serious matter to the movie industry. After the introduction DVD disc, people in Asian countries do not go to movie theaters anymore. They just watch pirate DVD movie at home, causing local movie industry suffers greatly and large amount of movie theaters are closed. This is because the enforcing of the law is is weak. In other words the controlling is weak. This does not happen in Western countries because people have self-discipline. The lockdown in the fighting against covid-19 pandemic requires controlling be strictly applied. That is why Chinese can successfully defeat the covid-19 pandemic while Westerners fail. Westerners are not used to this type of tight controlling.

My theory requires some critical thinking to come up with the correct answer, just like the Wright brothers’ particular wing shape requires some critical thinking to figure out that it can produce lift. I derive my theory by using logical reasoning (logical reasoning is an essential part of critical thinking). I fell it is very logical to assume that the reason why animals have instincts is that instinct is merely memory transmitted genetically from one generation to the next in the form of "old experience." At present we have no knowledge how is this done (my next theory may give us some hint) and we can work on that part later. I feel my second assumption is very logical too. That is because humans are animals, whatever rules can be applied to animals should also be feasible for humans. Thus, humans should have genetic behaviors, just like animals have instincts. The only different between humans and animals is humans are intelligent animals. If a certain genetic behavior does not fit well in the present environment, humans can adjust that behavior quickly. Animals cannot. Because humans can make behavioral adjustment that is why people have not noticed humans also have instincts (genetic behaviors).

The first step to adjusting Hong Kong's youths' unfit behaviors is to validate my "Theory of Human Genetic Behaviors." If my theory is validate as true (which I believe so), we can let them know they have genetically passed down behaviors that are unfit in a democratic society. Those behaviors need to be adjusted to operate a truly democratic society. The way to validate this "Theory of Human Genetic Behaviors" is as follows:

We can disseminate a survey. I need data to show that human genetic behaviors are observed by most people. Now we assess how people in the world behave via data collecting. We use the three groups of people above, the Westerners, the desert people, and the hot weather people for data collection. Conducting a survey can validate my theory because, by observation, we have determined animals have instincts. We can use the same method to confirm if humans have genetic behaviors, too. This is the only way because up to now we have not uncovered how our memories are recorded. So observe the way how the Westerners, the desert people, and the hot weather people behave concerning their respective genetic background, choose which model is closer to reality:

Model 1: The human mind is blank at birth, so humans need to learn everything anew.

Model 2: Humans have genetic behaviors just like animals possess instincts. But humans are intelligent animals. Humans can adjust their genetic behaviors quickly to fit the new environment. That is why people have not noticed humans' genetic behaviors.

Considering the following facts before people make their choice:

1. Black youths are reported to exhibit violence tendencies. The number of black youths involved in violence is disproportional to their population, especially in fatal shooting cases. As mentioned above the ancestors of black youths lived in a hot environment that was overcrowded. Therefore, the individual or small group fighting to compete for resources became common. This does show black youths' violence is caused by their ancestors' environmental experiences genetically passed down to them. I have noticed most fatal shooting cases involve black youths. If we can let them know that they have this violence genetic behavior which is unfit in the present environment, a lot of life can be saved.

2. The abortion issue is mainly concerned with Westerners, both in the pro and anti-abortion groups. Non-Westerners seldom see this is an issue. As mentioned above, Westerners' ancestors lived the cold environment where life was considered to be very precious, because the cold weather could kill. Therefore they needed to preserve life all they could. But the environment has changed. In today's situation, it brings hardship to force a woman to raise an unwanted child. Therefore, we have the pro-abortion group were Westerners who have undertaken a critical thinking exercise and the anti-abortion group where Westerners who have not yet. This does show the abortion issue among Westerners is caused by their ancestors' experience genetically passed down to them. This also explains why other races do not see abortion as an issue.

3. Everyone considers one's life as the most important thing, yet Arabic youths and young people can perform suicide bombing. I can explain this from a genetic point of view. Arabic people's ancestors lived in the desert environment where water was very scarce. People formed groups for hunting. If the group's water storage was diminished in the middle of the desert, the whole group would face death. In the desert environment, group fighting was common for scarce resources. Some loyal group member of a certain group might be considered sacrifice oneself for the good of the group. So he/she stealthily by the cover of the night destroyed the other group's water storage. Of cause, he/she would be killed by the other group by doing so. This experience can be genetically passed down to our modern Arabic people. This is my explanation of why Arabic youths and young people can do a suicide bombing. This shows the reason why Arabic youths and young people can do suicide bombing has a genetic factor.

4. US consist of 50 constituent entities. Before 1776, they were all separate entities. At that time people could see that if all the entities could join together and became a large union, every entity would be benefited economically. So they willingly joined together and became the United States. After that, the United States improves tremendously both economically and politically that the US becomes the most powerful country on earth. On the other hand, in the Middle East in Libya and Samaria, the country is divided into many small entities that each entity acts like a country of its own. They are fighting with each other. This tension causes great suffering to the people. A large number of refugees rush to Europe. Why is there such a profound difference? The disparity is caused by people's diversity in genetic behaviors. The Westerners genetically consider economics is the most important factor in joining or separating a country. However, the desert people genetically consider ranking improvement when separating from a country. As mentioned above ranking was established in the desert people. All the time people wanted to improve their ranking. They wanted to be on the top. This desire can be passed down genetically. If a portion of the country can separate from a country, people of that portion will improve their ranking by getting rid of higher-ranking people on the top. Therefore, desert people countries can only be divided into smaller ones until there is a war where the stronger entity conquers the smaller ones. This shows the difference between Westerners and Easterners in the different way of separating and joining of a country has a genetic factor.

People can consider the above facts when choosing the survey. I encourage you to do a critical thinking exercise to figure out should humans also have genetic behaviors just like animals have instincts? This exercise has nothing to do with one’s academic knowledge. It has everything to do with one’s critical thinking skill. You can do discussion of my theory with your friends too.Then use your logical reasoning to come to your conclusion. After viewing many cases of human behaviors having a genetic factor, is the human mind full of experiences from our ancestors? People can make a logical choice.

Create your own user feedback survey

If my theory is validated to be true, then we say humans have genetic behaviors, just like animals have instincts. We can set up a discussion session to highlight what genetic behaviors of non-Westerners which are unfit in a democratic society. A Democratic Behaviors Counsel should be set up in a university in Hong Kong to advice people of proper democratic behaviors. Only then Hong Kong people can run a democratic society.

I reiterate democracy is a self-discipline governance system. It requires its people to have a high level of self-discipline skills to be successful in running a democratic society. The citizens of Hong Kong will fail in attempting to adapt to a truly democratic society unless they can adjust their genetic behaviors passed down from a controlling type of governance system to fit a democratic type system. This "Theory of Human Genetic Behaviors" is the only way to let those Hong Kong youths understand the cause of their inappropriate behaviors and subsequently adjust their behaviors. Because they are deceived by Westerners and they act with the instinct to their passed down genetic behaviors which are unfit in a democratic system, they do not know what they are doing is wrong. Therefore they should have limited amnesty for their wrongdoing. Of course they must pass a critical thinking exercise that they have adjusted their unfit behaviors. This could be a way out of the present chaotic situation in Hong Kong. Hong Kong youth protesters are exactly like Russians before the collapse of the Soviet Union. If we allow them to have their way, Hong Kong will be destroyed exactly like the Soviet Union. Hong Kong youth protesters whole-heartedly believe democracy is easy and can bring prosperity quickly. But the experience from the Soviet Union is their country's economic system was ruined, even pension fund was empty. People were out of jobs. The whole society went into chaos. The reason is democracy has its own set of behaviors that needs to be strictly followed. This set of behaviors was created by Westerners' cold-weather environment, which was different from the desert environment or the hot weather environment. Non-Westerners require a learning period to acquire those behaviors. That is why all non-Westerners failed in adapting democracy. Hong Kong youth protesters please do critical thinking, wake up from their false belief and do not be deceived. The high percentage of Hong Kong people believe democracy is easy and can bring prosperity quickly shows how well this deceiving trick can deception people. The Russians were totally deceived. Hong Kong is at least not so bad. Also, two genetic factors cause some people of Hong Kong to turn opposition against China are 1. they want "ranking improvement" (not to be ruled by some higher authority but they want to rule other people) and 2. They have a genetic image that China is a highly corrupted country. The reason for first factor is as mentioned above a ranking system was created in the desert people in ancient time. All the time members wanted to improve their ranking stand. This can be passed down to our modern people. If Hong Kong is separated from China, they can achieve “ranking improvement” by getting rid of control from China. The second factor factor is that China was the center of the world for a long time. China had no outside competition until the last two hundred years ago. Therefore, government officials became complacent. They became corrupted. The image of China was a corrupted country that can genetically pass down to some Hong Kong people (rule 1). But China has changed dramatically in the last thirty years. China performs anti-corruption programs and now China is the second-largest economic country of the world.

I am a critical thinking type of innovator. Critical thinkers can come up with ideas that people often do not believe that will be turned out to be true until the ideas are validated by experiments. Critical thinkers are people like the Wright brothers and Thomas Edison. The Wright brothers developed the hypothesis that a bird's wing produces lift not only because it flaps, but because of its characteristic shape, i.e., arched on its upper surface and flat on its lower surface. At that time they were ridiculed by scholars. The brothers subsequently built a wind tunnel to validate their hypothesis as true. Many scholars also did not believe Edison’s talking machine would work until it was demonstrated in front of them. They were lucky that they would carry out their simple experiments by themselves to validate their ideas. I have come up with two innovations and two inventions. My ideas need the sophisticated equipment of a lab to validate them or a well-known organizaion to carry a survey to validate this theory. But nowadays people with critical thinking skills are rare. I cannot find scholars with critical thinking skills to agree with my ideas and willing to validate my ideas. This "Theory of Human Genetic Behaviors" is one of my innovations. When evaluating a critical thinking type innovation, base one's conclusion on whether the arguments presented are logical and whether there is potential the idea will be turned out to be true. There is no high level of academic knowledge is required. I hope some scholars are willing to validate my ideas. The next pages are my other critical thinking of innovation and two inventions. One important innovative theory is it can explain how memory can be passed down to our next generation. Please visit.

I come from an old Hong Kong family. I love Hong Kong. I do not want Hong Kong to be destroyed by some brainwashed youths. My great grandfather was a successful builder in Hong Kong around 1890. His name is Cheng Yue . A great deal of the city of Hong Kong was built by him. You can search the web for his story by Cheng Yue. You can also find my name on that webpage when you go further down. In 1974 I immigrated to Canada.

If you have comment or scientific discussion on my theory write to my email Stephen Cheng

[NEXT] [PREVIOUS] [HOME]